Lmao dude, who giveth a fuck about gender-distinctions when you can celebrate the wedding-hymn of your right hand to any person you want? And if it is at least a little bit gay to love traps, then it is certainly gay. So long as the distinction between trap-women and non-trap-women exists, it must be at least a little gay to love traps. For it is the differences between species from which we derive our definitions. Likewise, if one were to love trap-women, to the exclusion of other women, we would say that this person is a lover of the differentiating quality of traps, which is “having been raised as boys”, and hence that this person is straight in some ways, but also gay. If one were to be a lover of tall women to the exclusion of women of other heights, we would say that this person is a lover of “tallness”. However, insofar as traps exist as a distinct species of women, it must be fundamentally gay to love them, for the differentia of a trap is the quality of “having been raised as a boy”. This would mean that traps are women, which makes it not gay for a man to love them. Suppose, for the sake of argument, that traps were just a species within the genus of women, just as “tall women” are.
![the age old philosophical question are traps gay meme the age old philosophical question are traps gay meme](http://courtweek.com/yahoo_site_admin/assets/images/EXAMINER-Urinals.26535747_std.jpg)
Therefore, it is not gay to love traps, for one loves not the earthly body of a young boy but a transcendent Woman-Beauty that is fundamentally female in nature and completely incorporeal.
![the age old philosophical question are traps gay meme the age old philosophical question are traps gay meme](https://vigoweed.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/IMG-20200728-WA0040.jpg)
This love is something which has its timeless origin in the domain of Forms before it could ever become instantiated in the world of bodies. We see that there are some who love traps but despise overly-masculine bodies, and for these people, it is not proper to speak of them as being gay at all, for the nature of gayness - if gayness were to exist - is the love of a gender which is the same as yours. If however, they could not at all tell the difference, then the implication is again that the person is gay, based on the notion that a heterosexual man could tell the difference, and could not be fooled into finding a person of the same gender to be attractive.īasically, the term ‘trap’ emerges from the feeling of the heterosexual male being lured into this dilemma, and being confronted with their own discomfort towards potentially being perceived to be gay.įor a man to love traps is not gay by any measure, for traps embody the true form of feminine Beauty, which suffers no constraint by any earthly gender but is rather fulfilled in all feminine bodies regardless of their biological origins.įor example, one might love and admire a statue of a woman, but we would never call such a person a statue-lover, for it is the form of the Female which is instantiated in the statue that this person admires likewise with traps.If on the other hand ze was regarded as female but was actually born male, then certainly you are gay based on the fact that you acknowledge the beauty of a genetic man.Albeit not valid, the argument is that denying feminine beauty is an indication of being gay.
![the age old philosophical question are traps gay meme the age old philosophical question are traps gay meme](https://i.redd.it/njiz0p7zu2g31.jpg)
If ze was regarded as male but is actually female, then that would be denying her female identity on the basis of fear of being perceived as gay.To elaborate on the three possibilities described above: If ze is regarded as a ze, then they have acknowledged they either cannot tell if ze was male or female, or it makes no difference to their attraction → gay.If ze is regarded as a she, then they have acknowledged her female presentation → gay.If ze is regarded as a he, then they have denied the female form being presented to them → gay.Now, the dilemma generally only emerges from the (repressed) heterosexual male perspective, which is defined by fear of being perceived as gay.